[Bioperl-l] Installing bioperl with Strawberry
Kevin Brown
Kevin.M.Brown at asu.edu
Mon Jun 16 16:47:43 UTC 2008
No experiences with SP, but if it supports PPM, then I would use those
rather than cpan for getting BioPerl installed on your system.
http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Installing_Bioperl_on_Windows
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioperl-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org
> [mailto:bioperl-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Amir Karger
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:19 AM
> To: bioperl-l at portal.open-bio.org
> Subject: [Bioperl-l] Installing bioperl with Strawberry
>
> I got a new Windows box and was going to install Bioperl.
>
> Questions: has anyone had experience, positive or negative, with using
> Strawberry Perl + Bioperl? I was thinking of going the
> Strawberry route
> because they claim it acts more like UNIX Perl, which would
> be nice. But
> if SP doesn't work with Bioperl, or is just generally
> horrible, I don't
> want to install it.
>
> SP claims it supports PPM, but I don't know whether I should
> use that or
> the CPAN bioperl install.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> -Amir Karger
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list