[Bioperl-l] extra rel. 1.6 suggestion

Sendu Bala bix at sendu.me.uk
Thu Aug 23 14:57:21 UTC 2007

Chris Fields wrote:
> Maybe the best way out if this is a variation on something that was  
> suggested before, which was 'splitting' the code into groups.  What  
> if we set up a way to automatically gauge test coverage,  
> documentation, etc.?  If I remember correctly Nathan had something  
> running at one point which did this.

You can generate this yourself by doing
./Build testcover

Mauricio was going to sort out having this run daily with the results 
displayed on the website... Mauricio?

The major 'annoyance' is that the coverage results don't get generated 
if any test fails. But they shouldn't be failing anyway ;)

More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list