[Bioperl-l] Clarifying license of bioperl
cjfields at uiuc.edu
Sat Aug 18 16:42:04 UTC 2007
On Aug 18, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Alex Lancaster wrote:
>> I imagine the intent of the bioperl
>> contributors is that it should be under the same terms as Perl,
>> whatever that happens to be (which just happens to be GPL or
>> which is fine).
> I fully agree.
>> A clarification to that effect would be useful.
> Agreed, too. Would you mind changing that language on the wiki, since
> you seem to have a fairly good grasp on the issue?
Looks like the modules mostly state 'You may distribute this module
under the same terms as perl itself', but there are likely a few
which need to be changed. Might be worth running a quick code audit
to see what's present.
More information about the Bioperl-l