[Bioperl-l] Clarifying license of bioperl

[Hilmar Lapp]

On Aug 18, 2007, at 7:33 AM, Alex Lancaster wrote:

> I imagine the intent of the bioperl
> contributors is that it should be under the same terms as Perl,
> whatever that happens to be (which just happens to be GPL or Artistic,
> which is fine).

I fully agree.

>   A clarification to that effect would be useful.

Agreed, too. Would you mind changing that language on the wiki, since  
you seem to have a fairly good grasp on the issue?

	-hilmar
-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:-  hlapp at gmx dot net :
===========================================================