[Bioperl-l] Fwd: Exception.t is still failing miserably

[Steve Chervitz]

The modules that were formerly in scripts/exceptions are really more 
appropriate for the examples directory, since they illustrate the usage 
of some of the Bio::Root:: modules (e.g., how to create a module that 
derives from Bio::Root::RootI, how to create an impl of this, and how 
to throw exceptions).

How about if I move scripts/exceptions to examples/root? I could move 
the .pm files into a examples/root/lib to keep them separate from 
scripts which use them.

I noticed that the files in scripts/tools have also gone missing. These 
are more appropriate as examples and (I think most of them) are still 
relevant. How about moving these into examples/tools?

Steve

On Tuesday, Mar 4, 2003, at 01:40 US/Pacific, Heikki Lehvaslaiho wrote:

> TestObject.pm really should not be in scripts. Fix the test, then it is
> up to Steve S. to clean up the code before putting it back - if he 
> wants
> to do it. Steve?
>
> 	-heikki
>
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 07:41, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>> So I found where TestObject.pm used to be:
>>
>> [lapp at pub repository]$ find . -name "TestObject*"
>> ./bioperl/bioperl-live/examples/exceptions/Attic/TestObject.pm,v
>> ./bioperl/bioperl-live/scripts/exceptions/Attic/TestObject.pm,v
>>
>> The one in examples/exceptions has been dead for a long time:
>>
>> revision 1.5
>> date: 2002/08/26 12:45:15;  author: bosborne;  state: dead;  lines: +0
>> -0
>> Merging scripts and examples...
>>
>> The one in scripts/exceptions, however, only died recently:
>>
>> revision 1.2
>> date: 2003/02/25 09:47:28;  author: bosborne;  state: dead;  lines: +0
>> -0
>> Moving scripts
>>
>> I agree it's pretty bad to have a test script depend on a module under
>> scripts/, or examples/ for that matter, but this needs to be resolved.
>> Brian, what do you suggest? Where is this module to be resurrected?
>>
>> 	-hilmar
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Hilmar Lapp <hlapp at gnf.org>
>>> Date: Mon Mar 3, 2003  11:30:42  PM US/Pacific
>>> To: Bioperl <bioperl-l at bioperl.org>
>>> Subject: Exception.t is still failing miserably
>>>
>>> This is on Mac OSX, perl 5.6.0. I have no idea where TestObject.pm
>>> should be coming from. Does anyone else see this?
>>>
>>> What is weird is that the test script itself doesn't seem to have 
>>> been
>>> changed since October 2002, and I know for a fact that this used to
>>> pass until shortly ago without throw-up. Can anyone comment what's
>>> going on here?
>>>
>>> 	-hilmar
>>>
>>> t/Exception..................Can't locate TestObject.pm in @INC (@INC
>>> contains: t ./scripts/exceptions . blib/arch blib/lib
>>> /System/Library/Perl/darwin /System/Library/Perl /sw/lib/perl5/darwin
>>> /sw/lib/perl5 /Library/Perl/darwin /Library/Perl
>>> /Network/Library/Perl/darwin /Network/Library/Perl) at t/Exception.t
>>> line 35.
>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/Exception.t line 35.
>>> t/Exception..................dubious
>>>         Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
>>> DIED. FAILED tests 1-8
>>>         Failed 8/8 tests, 0.00% okay
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
>>> GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> -- 
> ______ _/      _/_____________________________________________________
>       _/      _/                      http://www.ebi.ac.uk/mutations/
>      _/  _/  _/  Heikki Lehvaslaiho          heikki at ebi.ac.uk
>     _/_/_/_/_/  EMBL Outstation, European Bioinformatics Institute
>    _/  _/  _/  Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton
>   _/  _/  _/  Cambs. CB10 1SD, United Kingdom
>      _/      Phone: +44 (0)1223 494 644   FAX: +44 (0)1223 494 468
> ___ _/_/_/_/_/________________________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>