[Bioperl-l] Re: [Root-l] new Bioperl bug tracking system

[Lars G. T. Jorgensen]

Ewan Birney <birney@ebi.ac.uk> writes:

> On 22 Oct 2002, Lars G. T. Jorgensen wrote:
> 
> > Hilmar Lapp <hlapp@gnf.org> writes:
> >
> > > I just did this for bioperl. We also have bioperl-bugs@bio.perl.org in
> > > the PODs as a way to submit bugs. I'm not sure whether this is still
> > > accepted?
> >
> > Not to be a smart ass, but doesn't CPAN offer Request Tracker as a
> > service + all the perl developement uses it + it has a e-mail
> > interface.
> 
> We use what works and what people have the time and effort to put in. To
> be honest, I was happy with jitterbug
> 
> >
> > BTW. Are there any plans of deprecating LargeSeq* since it exposes
> > implementation?
> 
> In what way does it expose its implementation except in the constructor,
> which - as it is a different implementation -  it has to expose?
> 

I just think it's a bit strange that I have to change my Sequence
object depending on my input size. It was the thing that confused me
the most when starting to use bioperl was the inheritens tree of a
sequence. 

But most of my problems might be caused by my lack of
insight into biology jargon...

> 
> ...confused...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 
> 

-- 
Mvh|Regards, Lars
System administrator     | Student 
Bioinformatics Centre    | Department of Computer Science  
University of Copenhagen | University of Copenhagen
http://www.binf.ku.dk    | http://www.diku.dk
When's the last time you used duct tape on a duct? -- Larry Wall