[Bioperl-l] Re: [Root-l] new Bioperl bug tracking system

[Lars G. T. Jorgensen]

Hilmar Lapp <hlapp@gnf.org> writes:

> I just did this for bioperl. We also have bioperl-bugs@bio.perl.org in
> the PODs as a way to submit bugs. I'm not sure whether this is still
> accepted?

Not to be a smart ass, but doesn't CPAN offer Request Tracker as a
service + all the perl developement uses it + it has a e-mail
interface.

BTW. Are there any plans of deprecating LargeSeq* since it exposes
implementation?



> 
> 	-hilmar
> 
> On Monday, October 21, 2002, at 09:28 AM, chris dagdigian wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We've depreciated our jitterbug bug tracking system in favor of the
> > bugzilla implementation that Jason and Jeff set up. The new URL for
> > reporting Bioperl bugs is: http://bugzilla.bioperl.org. Jason has
> > already imported all of the outstanding jitterbug reports into the
> > bugzilla system.
> >
> > I still need to clean up mentions of the old URL in the website and
> > deal
> > with getting sendmail to send back a new autoreply for emails that
> > go to
> > the old 'bioperl-bugs@Bioperl.org' address.
> >
> > Developers- please update documentation. We have boilerplate bug
> > info in
> > lots of places that needs to be updated. This is something that can
> > likely be automated. Not urgent but should be done before the next
> > non-developer release.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Root-l mailing list  -  Root-l@bioperl.org
> > http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/root-l
> >
> >

-- 
Mvh|Regards, Lars
System administrator     | Student 
Bioinformatics Centre    | Department of Computer Science  
University of Copenhagen | University of Copenhagen
http://www.binf.ku.dk    | http://www.diku.dk
When's the last time you used duct tape on a duct? -- Larry Wall