[MOBY-dev] RFC #1941 Asynchronous Service Call Proposal

[David Gonzalez Pisano]

Robert Buels escribió:
>> use the mixed mode. Because if we do so, we cannot use xxx_result as a
>> cleaning method (see more about cleaning below), we would need to have
>> another method, such as xxx_clean.
>>
>>   No. Johan is using 'job' for one request (which can have more mobyData
>> parts). Once you call xxx_async, the whole such request is identified by a
>> 'job identifier'.
>>  
>>
>>     
> It looks to me like our different interpretations here might be because 
> of a lack of clarity in number 2 on page 8 of the RFC.  It doesn't 
> really specify whether one mobyStatus block is returned with an asyncID 
> referring to all the submitted jobs/mobyData blocks, or whether one 
> mobyStatus is returned for each mobyData in the input, with a separate 
> ID for each.  I assumed the latter, and I think Martin assumed the 
> former.  Whichever way it was intented, I definitely think we should get 
> one unique asyncID per mobyData in the input.
>
>   
Maybe the wording has to be change to make it clearer, but the idea is 
exactly like Robert interprets it: having a single and unique mobyStatus 
(ie, asyncID) for each one of the mobyData (ie, queryIDs) sent in the 
original execution request.

David