[DAS] 1.53E validation errors

[Andy Jenkinson]

Dave, if you try to validate again, does it work now?

On 1 Sep 2010, at 14:27, Jonathan Warren wrote:

> Hi Dave
> 
> Thanks for the feedback!
> 
> I'll look into caching again on the validation - I've previously put in all the standard headers etc to prevent caching but maybe I have to resort to adding a unique parameter for each response as well to avoid caching. I've not really experienced any problems with caching recently myself.
> 
> With regards to DSN being invalid when stated in the sources document I agree it's a bit of a usability issue so I've now changed it so that the registry will not complain about this and tolerate it both for 1.53E and 1.6E specifications. Putting DSN validation is on my todo list - but it's very little gain in my opinion as it's simple and not got much to validate (as apposed to the sources document) and is also completely super-seeded by the sources document. The registry and DAS in general is getting more and more dependent on a valid sources document (ensembl works much more smoothly with it to name one example and in the very near future people can register many sources at once using the sources document in the registry and the sources will be auto updating to show any changes in the server). So for this reason the sources document should be encouraged as much as possible over DSN. If others have a strong opinion about DSNs being listed by the registry in sources capabilities and validated then let me know and I'll bump it up my list of things to do.
> 
> On 27 Aug 2010, at 15:54, Andy Jenkinson wrote:
> 
>> There is some caching going on in the registry which I've never got to the bottom of (HTTP caching is quite hard to debug!), but it should sort itself out.
>> 
>> Regarding the dsn thing, I don't think we ever really decided whether it should be a valid capability to report in the sources document, but it isn't in the registry's list and so newer versions of 1.53E proserver don't report it. However, since "das1:sources" -is- reported by servers in 1.6 and the DAS registry itself (because the query_uri has a specific function), my personal view is that we should allow reporting of dsn for 1.53 too. Jon?
>> 
>> On 27 Aug 2010, at 15:07, Dave Messina wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi everybody,
>>> 
>>> After receiving an automated notice that my DAS 1.53E servers are scheduled for deletion, I'm trying to bring them into compliance. I'm not sure exactly how to fix the validation issues, though, so I'm here to ask for help.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 1. sources
>>> 
>>> When validating my server, the DAS registry reports this error:
>>> 
>>> capability is stated for this server but is not valid or provided.validating http://das.sbc.su.se:9000//das/sources RegReportErrorHandler.Error Line Number:4 column number:467 attribute "type" has a bad value. Possible values are: das1:alignment,das1:component,das1:cors,das1:dna,das1:entry_points,das1:error-segment,das1:feature-by-id,das1:features,das1:interaction,das1:maxbins,das1:sequence,das1:sources,das1:structure,das1:stylesheet,das1:supercomponent,das1:types,das1:unknown-feature,das1:unknown-segment
>>> 
>>> 
>>> My DAS server does provide a sources response, including capabilities:
>>> 
>>> 	http://das.sbc.su.se:9000//das/sources
>>> 
>>> But I'm not sure why it's invalid.
>>> 
>>> The capability types my server returns are:
>>> 
>>> das1:dsn
>>> das1:features
>>> das1:stylesheet
>>> 
>>> das1:dsn isn't in the list possible values; is it no longer valid?
>>> 
>>> Otherwise, I wonder if this is because I'm running an ancient version of ProServer (v463).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2. stylesheet
>>> 
>>> When validating, the registry reports this error:
>>> 
>>> capability was stated for this server but is either not present or valid.validating http://das.sbc.su.se:9000//das/hmmtop/stylesheet RegReportErrorHandler.Error Line Number:9 column number:17 tag name "FONT" is not allowed. Possible tag names are: <BGCOLOR>,<BUMP>,<HEIGHT>,<LABEL>,<LINEWIDTH> RegReportErrorHandler.Error Line Number:18 column number:17 tag name "FONT" is not allowed. Possible tag names are: <BGCOLOR>,<BUMP>,<HEIGHT>,<LABEL>,<LINEWIDTH> RegReportErrorHandler.Error Line Number:27 column number:17 tag name "FONT" is not allowed. Possible tag names are: <BGCOLOR>,<BUMP>,<HEIGHT>,<LABEL>,<LINEWIDTH> the document is NOT valid.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I've removed that tag from the stylesheet and verified that my server is no longer presenting it:
>>> 
>>> 	http://das.sbc.su.se:9000/das1/hmmtop/stylesheet
>>> 
>>> However, when I try to revalidate, the registry reports the same error.
>>> 
>>> Is there perhaps caching going on?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks for any suggestions,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DAS mailing list
>>> DAS at lists.open-bio.org
>>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DAS mailing list
>> DAS at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das
> 
> Jonathan Warren
> Senior Developer and DAS coordinator
> blog: http://biodasman.wordpress.com/
> jw12 at sanger.ac.uk
> Ext: 2314
> Telephone: 01223 492314
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome ResearchLimited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and acompany registered in England with number 2742969, whose registeredoffice is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.