[Bioperl-l] open question about Unflattener
cjmungall at lbl.gov
Wed Mar 5 20:28:55 UTC 2014
I don't recall the reason for there being two. Go ahead and merge (and
add any new tests you like).
On 5 Mar 2014, at 12:05, Francisco J. Ossandón wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I was thinking about incorporating the proposed fix for Bug #3458
> (https://redmine.open-bio.org/issues/3458) on the module, when I
> realized of
> something else. SeqFeature/Unflattener have 2 very similar test files
> (Unflattener.t and Unflattener2.t), which look basically the same and
> the same internal subs except for using different test files.
> was created more than 10 years ago and have had almost no movement
> Im thinking on moving all tests to a single test file, since I
> dont see
> why there should be 2. So I would like to ask before if there is an
> important reason to keep both separated instead of merging them. Is ok
> merge them??
> Francisco J. Ossandon
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
More information about the Bioperl-l