[Bioperl-l] open question about Unflattener

[Chris Mungall]

Francisco,

I don't recall the reason for there being two. Go ahead and merge (and 
add any new tests you like).

On 5 Mar 2014, at 12:05, Francisco J. Ossandón wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I was thinking about incorporating the proposed fix for Bug #3458
> (https://redmine.open-bio.org/issues/3458) on the module, when I 
> realized of
> something else. SeqFeature/Unflattener have 2 very similar test files
> (Unflattener.t and Unflattener2.t), which look basically the same and 
> use
> the same internal subs except for using different test files. 
> Unflattener2.t
> was created more than 10 years ago and have had almost no movement

>
>
>
> I’m thinking on moving all tests to a single test file, since I 
> don’t see
> why there should be 2. So I would like to ask before if there is an
> important reason to keep both separated instead of merging them. Is ok 
> to
> merge them??
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Francisco J. Ossandon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l