[Bioperl-l] open question about Unflattener

[Fields, Christopher J]

On Mar 5, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Francisco J. Ossandón <fossandonc at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> I was thinking about incorporating the proposed fix for Bug #3458
> (https://redmine.open-bio.org/issues/3458) on the module, when I realized of
> something else. SeqFeature/Unflattener have 2 very similar test files
> (Unflattener.t and Unflattener2.t), which look basically the same and use
> the same internal subs except for using different test files. Unflattener2.t
> was created more than 10 years ago and have had almost no movement.
> 
> 
> 
> I'm thinking on moving all tests to a single test file, since I don't see
> why there should be 2. So I would like to ask before if there is an
> important reason to keep both separated instead of merging them. Is ok to
> merge them??

Yep.  There isn’t any reason to leave them split.  

-c

> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> Francisco J. Ossandon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l