[Bioperl-l] Bio::Index::Fastq - Interface for indexing (multiple) fastq files failure
Chris Fields
cjfields at illinois.edu
Wed Apr 7 16:56:39 UTC 2010
I think we're going with the AnyDBM option, which allows SQLite if
requested (via Mark's SQLite_DBM).
chris
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 16:45 +0100, Peter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Cook, Malcolm <MEC at stowers.org> wrote:
> > c.f. http://github.com/acr/screed
>
> That's the python thing I referred to earlier, which turned out to be much
> slower than SQLite (comparing storing the FASTQ data in an indexed
> form, not just storing the file offsets):
>
> http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/biology-in-python/2010-March/000511.html
> http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/mar-10/storing-and-retrieving-sequences.html
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list