[Bioperl-l] [moby] Re: bioperl-pipeline?

[shawn hoon]

Hi, yes bioperl-pipeline is very much dead as far as I am concerned. I am
not sure if there are users out there still. Taverna looks like the way to
go.
shawn


On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Heikki Lehvaslaiho <
heikki.lehvaslaiho at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> Sorry to give you a jolt.
>
> Maybe the website should reflect the activity. The last archive is
> from June 2008 and when that is the only date on the home page it is a
> bit worrying.
>
> The Moby release link goes through several steps to the CPAN page with
> a module version 1.04 and download version 1.06 (confusing?) and a
> copyrigh notice from 2007.
>
> Not finding any (apparent) recent activity, I got worried.
>
>
>   -Heikki
>
>
> 2009/1/29 Mark Wilkinson <markw at illuminae.com>:
> > There are even more recent releases if you download directly from CPAN,
> and
> > there are a half-dozen or more CVS commits today alone...
> >
> > It's very much an active project!!
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:42:09 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I see there is a Moby code release from Feb. 2008, so I'm assuming it's
> >> very much 'alive' and happy (and still active).
> >>
> >> http://biomoby.org/PerlReleases/
> >>
> >> chris
> >>
> >> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Biomoby is.... errr.... happy :-)
> >>>
> >>> ?  status in what respect ?
> >>>
> >>> M
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:23:00 -0800, Chris Fields <
> cjfields at illinois.edu>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Mark,
> >>>>
> >>>> I think the general idea was to know what the status of biomoby and
> >>>> bioperl-pipeline was (not the two together).
> >>>>
> >>>> chris
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hmmm... I can't tell what you want me to do here...  Are there
> biomoby
> >>>>> components in bioperl-pipeline?  If so,can you tell me which services
> you
> >>>>> need me to look at?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> M
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:33:11 -0800, Chris Fields
> >>>>> <cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> biopipe.org is dead. I don't know whether that extends then to
> >>>>>>> bioperl-pipeline, but quite possibly so.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My guess is yes, it is dead.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Biomoby is alive (if possibly in hibernation) AFAIAA. Maybe if we
> all
> >>>>>>> collectively yell "Mark" he'll wake up and say something.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>        -hilmar
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> MAARRRRRKKK!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> chris
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>   -Heikki
> Heikki Lehvaslaiho - heikki lehvaslaiho gmail com
> http://kapkaupunki.blogspot.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>