[Bioperl-l] First cut svn repository [was Re: SVN and ...Re: Perltidy]

[Chris Fields]

On Jun 27, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:

>
> On Jun 27, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
>
>> Most projects make a clean break with cvs (no more commits) for the
>> reasons you point out.  Not sure how the other core devs feel about
>> that but I could go for that; it would def. prevent headaches.
>
> There shouldn't be any cvs write support after the cut-over I  
> think. I don't see the benefit that would justify the huge headache  
> potential.
>
> 	-hilmar

Agreed, so maybe we should set that in stone.  That means no svn->cvs  
syncing post-migration as well, I assume.

Now how about a quick straw poll, what kind of access?  svn+ssh is  
already available, but some (Aaron among them) have indicated they  
would like https as well (not sure how involved it would be to set up).

chris