[Bioperl-l] RC3 candidates

[George Hartzell]

Aaron J. Mackey writes:
 > I would highly recommend that stuff in the bioperl-* namespace be co- 
 > numbered, so that we can simply say BioPerl 1.5.1 and know what we're  
 > talking about, regardless of the CVS packaging.  BioSQL, an  
 > independent project, can have any numbering it desires.
 > [...]

Whatever version number you choose, it'd be really useful to assign a
tag in the repository that marks the release as part of the great
bioperl release of 1.5.1.

g.