[Bioperl-l] RC3 candidates

[Jason Stajich]

Oh we will for sure, not to worry.  I just haven't been tagging the  
RC because we are going through them pretty fast.

-jason
On Sep 30, 2005, at 1:12 PM, George Hartzell wrote:

> Aaron J. Mackey writes:
>
>> I would highly recommend that stuff in the bioperl-* namespace be co-
>> numbered, so that we can simply say BioPerl 1.5.1 and know what we're
>> talking about, regardless of the CVS packaging.  BioSQL, an
>> independent project, can have any numbering it desires.
>> [...]
>>
>
> Whatever version number you choose, it'd be really useful to assign a
> tag in the repository that marks the release as part of the great
> bioperl release of 1.5.1.
>
> g.
>
>

--
Jason Stajich
Duke University
http://www.duke.edu/~jes12