[Bioperl-l] script installation

[Heikki Lehvaslaiho]

Shouldn't that README, or something similar, be in scripts directory
rather than further down?

Also, I've written the documentation for several scripts assuming that
the name conversion will be xxx.PLS -> xxx (and not xxx.pl). What is
correct?

Should we try the new scripts already in 1.2.1 release? I thought that
was the intension.

	-Heikki

On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 13:23, Brian Osborne wrote:
> Lincoln and Jason,
> 
> The README in scripts/utilities says:
> 
> This directory is for robust scripts which have documentation,
> cmdline arguments, and can be used in a production environment.
> Their extensions will be renamed .pl and will be installed in
> the SCRIPT_INSTALL directory as defined in the Makefile.PL
> configuration.
> 
> We should probably go ahead and implement this, or temporarily remove this
> README.
> 
> If you'd like to proceed with the former I can make sure that the script
> installation is documented in the appropriate places, and I'll also go ahead
> and test all the scripts in scripts/ as best as I can, as promised. Your
> thoughts?
> 
> Brian O.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
-- 
______ _/      _/_____________________________________________________
      _/      _/                      http://www.ebi.ac.uk/mutations/
     _/  _/  _/  Heikki Lehvaslaiho          heikki at ebi.ac.uk
    _/_/_/_/_/  EMBL Outstation, European Bioinformatics Institute
   _/  _/  _/  Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton
  _/  _/  _/  Cambs. CB10 1SD, United Kingdom
     _/      Phone: +44 (0)1223 494 644   FAX: +44 (0)1223 494 468
___ _/_/_/_/_/________________________________________________________