[Bioperl-l] Makefile.PL

[Jason Stajich]

ugh - but then people can't tell the difference if they have bioperl 1.2.0
or 1.2.1 or 1.2.2 installed?

On the branch there is no way to tell then what version you have
installed....  I don't remember how Allen's stuff was suppposed to work in
terms of testing version number?

-j
On Mon, 8 Jul 2003, Heikki Lehvaslaiho wrote:

> Jason,
>
> Are you sure 1.2.2 is a legal version number? Is it > 1.2?
>
> I have a vague recollection of a rule somewhere saying that Makefile
> VERSION has to be a floating point number. I have not changed the
> version because of this, but then forgot to ask anyone.
>
> 	-Heikki
>
> On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 22:46, Jason Stajich wrote:
> > jason
> > Mon Jul  7 17:46:02 EDT 2003
> > Update of /home/repository/bioperl/bioperl-live
> > In directory pub.open-bio.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24617
> >
> > Modified Files:
> >       Tag: branch-1-2
> > 	Makefile.PL
> > Log Message:
> > insure conf VERSION is up to date
> >
> > bioperl-live Makefile.PL,1.50.2.1,1.50.2.2
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/repository/bioperl/bioperl-live/Makefile.PL,v
> > retrieving revision 1.50.2.1
> > retrieving revision 1.50.2.2
> > diff -u -r1.50.2.1 -r1.50.2.2
> > --- /home/repository/bioperl/bioperl-live/Makefile.PL	2003/07/03 20:02:03	1.50.2.1
> > +++ /home/repository/bioperl/bioperl-live/Makefile.PL	2003/07/07 21:46:02	1.50.2.2
> > @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@
> >  open(CONF,'>bioperl.conf') or die "couldn't open bioperl.conf";
> >
> >  print CONF<<'!NO!GROK!';
> > -VERSION		1.2
> > +VERSION		1.2.2
> >  AUTHORS		file://AUTHORS
> >  !NO!GROK!
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-guts-l mailing list
> > Bioperl-guts-l at portal.open-bio.org
> > http://portal.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-guts-l
>

--
Jason Stajich
Duke University
jason at cgt.mc.duke.edu