[Bioperl-l] GenBankParser comparison to bioperl parser

[Ewan Birney]

On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Lincoln Stein wrote:

> A separate repository is also fine with me, but I prefer Bioperl-contrib, 
> because it should not just be for utility code, and nicely echoes the 
> "contrib" directory of the X Windows Consortium code distribution.
> 
> I'll put Boulder into a Bioperl-contrib if there is one.


Deal. John --- sounds good to you?


> 
> Lincoln
> 
> On Thursday 12 September 2002 7:20 am, Elia Stupka wrote:
> > > I like the bioperl-util repository - "for professionals only" I think it
> > > keeps diversity without freaking newbies out and we can trade code.
> >
> > Rightie-ho, easiest way out, for some silly reason I thought nobody would
> > like that...
> >
> > Elia
> >
> > ********************************
> > * http://www.fugu-sg.org/~elia *
> > * tel:    +65 6874 1467        *
> > * mobile: +65 9030 7613        *
> > * fax:    +65 6779 1117        *
> > ********************************
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> > http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
<birney@ebi.ac.uk>. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------