[Bioperl-l] GenBankParser comparison to bioperl parser

[Lincoln Stein]

A separate repository is also fine with me, but I prefer Bioperl-contrib, 
because it should not just be for utility code, and nicely echoes the 
"contrib" directory of the X Windows Consortium code distribution.

I'll put Boulder into a Bioperl-contrib if there is one.

Lincoln

On Thursday 12 September 2002 7:20 am, Elia Stupka wrote:
> > I like the bioperl-util repository - "for professionals only" I think it
> > keeps diversity without freaking newbies out and we can trade code.
>
> Rightie-ho, easiest way out, for some silly reason I thought nobody would
> like that...
>
> Elia
>
> ********************************
> * http://www.fugu-sg.org/~elia *
> * tel:    +65 6874 1467        *
> * mobile: +65 9030 7613        *
> * fax:    +65 6779 1117        *
> ********************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l