[Bioperl-l] IO::String
Ewan Birney
birney@ebi.ac.uk
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:03:42 +0100 (BST)
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Jason Stajich wrote:
> Ewan - we talked before about providing an IO::String in the distro as it
> is necessary for one to run the basic remote DB lookups (what lots of
> people want to do out of the box). Are there any major negatives to just
> including it in the distro - I believe it is pure perl. Either wrapped
> inside a new Root class which will use the installed version over its own
> copy+paste implementation as we have done with File::Spec. Alternatively
> we can just provide a extras directory and place the latest IO-String in
> there.
I don't see any major negatives. Probably I think it would be better to
put it in Bio::Root::String::IO or soemthing so there is no namespace
clash, but if people think differently, I'm happy to hear other routes.
Bioperl working-out-of-the-box for common functionality on common perl
versions is a very good target.
>
> -jason
>
> --
> Jason Stajich
> Duke University
> jason at cgt.mc.duke.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
<birney@ebi.ac.uk>.
-----------------------------------------------------------------