[Bioperl-l] ...One more time...

[Jason Stajich]

All tests on linux x86 (RH 7.3, perl 5.6.1), sun ultra sparc (solaris 2.8,
perl 5.005), IRIX SGI ( , perl 5.6.1), Alpha (OSF1, perl 5.6.1)

(In some cases BioGraphics was not tested b/c GD or Text::Shellwords was
not installed)

All tests successful, 25 subtests skipped.
Files=121,  Tests=5044, 141 wallclock secs (125.43 cusr +  8.61 csys =
134.04 CPU)
$ uname -a
SunOS dev 5.8 Generic_108528-16 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraAX-i2
$ perl -v

This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for sun4-solaris
---
All tests successful, 6 subtests skipped.
Files=121, Tests=5044, 124 wallclock secs (76.05 cusr + 17.03 csys = 93.08
CPU)
bash$ uname -a
OSF1 sardo V4.0 1229 alpha
bash$ perl -v

This is perl, v5.6.0 built for alpha-dec_osf
---
All tests successful, 25 subtests skipped.
Files=121, Tests=5044, 147 wallclock secs (126.84 cusr + 11.60 csys =
138.44 CPU)
mendel 219% uname -a
IRIX64 mendel 6.5 10100655 IP27
mendel 220% perl -v

This is perl, v5.6.1 built for IP27-irix

-j

On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Ewan Birney wrote:

>
> [cue daft punk music... one more time...]
>
>
> All tests now pass for me, including dev.open-bio.org which is (I think)
> an out of the box sun4 solaris perl 5.005 install with weird Sun DBM files
> I think. So the tests are now much more tolerant to DBM file weirdness.
>
>
> If I could ask everyone with a co copy to cvs update and make test, then,
> assumming nothing big happens, tomorrow is release day.
>
>
> <grin>
>
>
> All tests successful, 25 subtests skipped.
> Files=121,  Tests=5044, 138 wallclock secs (124.28 cusr +  8.89 csys =
> 133.17 CPU)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>

-- 
Jason Stajich
Duke University
jason at cgt.mc.duke.edu