[Bioperl-l] Please test
Jason Stajich
jason@cgt.mc.duke.edu
Sun, 13 Oct 2002 09:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
arg - gotta change it back the other way, sprintf-ing the test value - in
the future if you are willing to tinker with the tests that would be
helpful since I can't really reproduce the bug w/o a windows box.
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Shailesh L Mistry wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> The error count now stands at :-
>
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t\SearchIO.t 658 24 3.65% 19 96 101 138 143 317 326 342 347
> 393 398 424 436 455 485 494-495 527
> 536-537 569 578-579 638
>
> > > 1) t\SearchIO.t (got:1.46134e-90 but expected:1.46134e-090)
> > >
> > Fixed I think, by explicitly doing sprintf('%g', $value) and made sure
> > all sci notation values are quoted as strings.
>
> I am afraid the last fix has just made it worse. All the errors listed above are
> due to the format of the output (got:xxxe-90 but expected:xxxe-090)
>
>
>
> > > 2) t\consed.t
> > This is plain silly, you'll never run consed on windows in the first
> > place, I say just skip tests for this module on windows platform. I'll
> > check that in.
>
> consed now correctly spots the operating system and skips the tests.
>
> Do you now if there any plans to port consed to a windows platform?
> I am willing to put some time in if the consed team would like a hand with
> this....
>
> Shelly.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
--
Jason Stajich
Duke University
jason at cgt.mc.duke.edu