[Bioperl-l] RE: bioperl-db - changes (Chris Mungall)

[Chris Mungall]

Oh, I'm just using the default branch rather than HEAD

Should I be using HEAD?

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Brian Desany wrote:

> <scratching head> I'm doing a "cvs status" and getting this:
> 
> >cvs status
> cvs server: Examining .
> ===================================================================
> File: BUGS              Status: Up-to-date
> 
>    Working revision:    1.2
>    Repository revision: 1.2     /home/repository/bioperl/bioperl-db/BUGS,v
>    Sticky Tag:          HEAD (revision: 1.2)
>    Sticky Date:         (none)
>    Sticky Options:      (none)
> 
> ===================================================================
> etc.....
> So it _seems_ like I've looking in the right spot for the right files
> (correct me if I'm wrong).
> 
> Also, since I'm not a cvs expert, I'll tell you that these two commands
> bring me the same (old) files (after logging in anonymously):
> 
> cvs -d :pserver:cvs@cvs.bioperl.org:/home/repository/bioperl co -r HEAD
> bioperl-db
> cvs -d :pserver:cvs@cvs.bioperl.org:/home/repository/bioperl co bioperl-db
> 
> On the other hand, "cvs -d
> :pserver:cvs@cvs.bioperl.org:/home/repository/bioperl co -r MAIN bioperl-db"
> fails because MAIN isn't a tag (so it tells me). Am I just flat out issuing
> the wrong checkout command? I don't do this too often...
> 
> -Brian.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Mungall [mailto:cjm@fruitfly.bdgp.berkeley.edu]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:17 PM
> > To: Brian Desany
> > Cc: bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> > Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] RE: bioperl-db - changes (Chris Mungall)
> >
> >
> >
> > Hmm, I just committed on the main branch - this is in the bioperl-db
> > project remember.
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Brian Desany wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see these changes when I do "cvs -n -q update" or
> > "cvs status" or go
> > > to WebCVS - is there normally some kind of a delay or is
> > there some other
> > > cvs command I need to use to find out which files have been
> > changed? Do I
> > > need to specify a particular branch maybe?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Brian.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I have committed some code to bioperl-db
> > > >
> > > > * Fuzzy Locations are now handled, using the
> > location_qualifier_value
> > > > table added to the biosql-schema during the hackathon.
> > > >
> > > > * Optimisations - all the features and locations for a
> > > > sequence entry are
> > > > now fetched in a few SQL calls rather than a number of calls
> > > > proportional
> > > > to the number of features.
> > > >
> > > > * Tidying - a lot of mysqlisms removed or pushed up to
> > the BaseAdaptor
> > > > layer, to allow for easier postgres support. Added a few
> > > > generic ease of
> > > > use methods to BaseAdaptor to more clearly expose the logic in the
> > > > individual adaptor layer.
> > > >
> > > > * DBTestHarness now no longer uses the copy of the schema in the
> > > > bioperl-db directory. Instead it checks
> > > > ../biosql-schema/sql/biosqldb-mysql.sql - hmmm, this won't
> > > > necessarily fit
> > > > with the cvs re-organisation. How should we do this? An env
> > > > var seems a
> > > > bit nasty.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > > Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> > > http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>