[Bioperl-l] Pushing towards 1.2

[Lincoln Stein]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the main reason that bioperl-run was moved out 
was because of the time it took to build and test.  How about moving just the 
remoteblast modules in?

Lincoln

On Sunday 01 December 2002 11:04 am, Ewan Birney wrote:
> On machines were I can run "make test" (... :( ...) it looks like 1.2 is
> in good shape. I will now be driving things towards final release
> quality. I am going to focus on documentation on the main modules with
> strong emphasis on smoothing the path for newcomers.
>
>
> Things to do:
>
>   (a) test, test, test, in particular on Windows boxes. Shelly et al: time
> for you guys to step up to the plate
>
>   (b) Fix Makefile.PL to encorporate new fix - Jason - do you know what is
> going on here or do you want to bounce that to me?
>
>   (c) Trial a merge of bioperl-live and bioperl-run ---- I think a merge
> is sane (note - should we just say "screw this, lets put the bioperl-run
> stuff back into bioperl-live" or something funkier). This is my headache.
>
>    I would love to hear the opinion of the core (jason, hilmar, lincoln
> and heikki) and also elia (who's group uses bioperl-run alot) about
> this. I think merging is the way forward. Other people's opinions are
> worth reading for sure but I am most interested in teh people who will
> bare the brunt of the decision to do this.
>
>
>    - My main point - We *have* to release a Bioperl which runs remoteblast
> "out of the box".
>
>
>
>    Aim for 1.2 before 31st Dec 2002 and a series of release candidates
> before christmas.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
> <birney@ebi.ac.uk>.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l

-- 
Lincoln Stein
lstein@cshl.org