[Bioperl-l] RE: FTLocationFactory causes lots of test failures?
Hilmar Lapp
hlapp@gnf.org
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:09:48 -0700
Sounds weird, and maybe the difference of warnings between your different installations is due to perl version differences.
There was, however, a minor bug in that a substitution was not disabled if the variable is undef (which may legally happen for the variable in question). I fixed this. Let me know if after a cvs update the warning messages disappear.
-hilmar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wiepert, Mathieu [mailto:Wiepert.Mathieu@mayo.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:57 AM
> To: Hilmar Lapp
> Subject: FTLocationFactory causes lots of test failures?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was getting alot of errors when testing my install of
> bioperl, most having to do with this module. I recently
> deleted all my bioperl directories, then got them all with
> the checkout of bioperl-all. The first thing I am making is
> bioperl-live. Am I perhaps missing a dependency, or is there
> an error condition that is not being handled in the code
> maybe? Not sure, I tried to run what looked like some of the
> test failures (SeqIO, Refseq), even with verbosity set on,
> but I didn't get the errors. Not sure what Makefile is doing
> differently.
>
>
> t/SeqFeature........ok 42/62Use of uninitialized value in
> substitution (s///) at
> blib/lib/Bio/Factory/FTLocationFactory.pm line 198, <GEN0> line 79.
> Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at
> blib/lib/Bio/Factory/FTLocationFactory.pm line 198, <GEN0> line 84.
> t/BioFetch_DB.......ok 2/27Use of uninitialized value in
> substitution (s///) at Bio/Factory/FTLocationFactory.pm line 198
>
> So, what am I doing wrong, since no one else appears to be
> complaining?
>
>