[Bioperl-l] release numbers

[Hilmar Lapp]

Hm. That automatically bumps all other packages to maturity? Well, if it saves a lot of hassle for the actual user ... does it really?

	-hilmar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Stajich [mailto:jason@cgt.mc.duke.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:18 PM
> To: Bioperl
> Subject: [Bioperl-l] release numbers
> 
> 
> Shall we release the bioperl-run, bioperl-db, and 
> bioperl-pipeline pkgs
> with the same version number as bioperl (1.1).  We can do it s.t.
> bioperl-pipeline 1.1.1 is compatible with bioperl 1.1 but 
> bioperl-pipeline
> 1.2 is not necessarily?  This sort of means we have to do the 
> major pkg
> releases in lock step with the bioperl core releases.  Is 
> this okay or is
> it going to be a major pain later on?
> 
> I don't want us to get into confusing situtations for users - as it is
> already a pain upgrading perl modules w/o doing with a pkg manager.
> 
> -jason
> 
> -- 
> Jason Stajich
> Duke University
> jason at cgt.mc.duke.edu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>