[Bioperl-l] 0.7.1 tests; Bio::Index::* stuff

Jason Stajich jason@chg.mc.duke.edu
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:31:32 -0400 (EDT)


On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Ewan Birney wrote:

> 
> 
> Using Compaq Alpha and perl 5.0004 all tests pass on the branch
> 
> 
> In fact - the t/Index.t failed, but this wasn't bioperl/perl's fault - we
> had a faulty DB_File installation. In the testing phase I think it would
> be better to use the "comes with Perl" SDDM_File implementation, rather
> than the DB_File implementation (agreed? Or not...?) 
> 
> 
> I have changed this in Index.t - is this ok to commit jason on branch and
> head?
> 
do it, that's fine.
> 
> We also leave around all the Wibbl.* files from this test. Should I unlink
> them? Is there a standard X-platform way to unlink (does unlink work?) for
> these guys?
> 
unlink should be the x-platform way.
> 
> 
> ewan
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
> <birney@ebi.ac.uk>. 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 

Jason Stajich
jason@chg.mc.duke.edu
Center for Human Genetics
Duke University Medical Center 
http://www.chg.duke.edu/