[Bioperl-l] question about Bio modules

[Ewan Birney]

On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Lorenz Pollak wrote:

> Hi to everyone!
> 
> As I am currently working on the BPlite.pm module
> to integrate it into bioperl, there's one thing
> I was wondering about.
> 
> There are two packages (BPlite and BPlite::Sbjct)
> in one file (BPlite.pm). So, shall I split this up
> into two files, or let it be "as is" ?

Split.

> 
> (actually there's also an BPlite::HSP, but this
> will be replaced by Bio::SeqFeature::FeaturePair)
> 
> Another interesting point would be, if there existed
> already a class for a BLAST Report Subject, that
> could replace BPlite::Sbjct...
> 

I would prefer (apologies steve) to keep BPLite separate from the
Bio::Tools::Blast, though them both sharing an interface would be good.
Bio::Tools::Blast is currently very hard to maintain, and the aim here is
to have a light-as-possible, easy to maintain module.


> thanks for any suggestions,
> Lorenz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
<birney@ebi.ac.uk>. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------