[Biojava-l] Problems (slight) with the Biojava code in CVS

[Matthew Pocock]

HI.

Thanks for looking at the biojava source.

You noticed :-)

For now delete all the coppies except biojava-live/src/org/acedb, which is the
correct one. Sorry - it got duplicated when I was moving the acedb code from
org.biojava.acedb to org.acedb - embarased.

We are trying to fix this as you speak - CVS is playing silly buggers. Anybody
got any ideas?

Matthew

ps all feedback, positive or negative is apreciated

"Triplett, Terry" wrote:

> I've successfully checked out the code via anonymous cvs, as per the
> instructions on the biojava site.  Starting from the top level directory, it
> looks like the same code is present more than in the source tree due to
> nesting, and it's causing some trouble with the build script.  For example,
> a 'find' for acedb (starting from the top directory created by cvs) shows:
>
>         biojava-live/src/org/acedb
>         biojava-live/src/org/acedb/biojava-live/src/org/acedb
>         biojava-live/src/org/acedb/biojava-live/src/org/biojava/bio/acedb
>         biojava-live/src/org/biojava/bio/acedb
>
> >From this it appears that the acedb tree is present in 4 different places.
> The build script fails with a number of 'already defined' errors.
> I haven't analyzed this in depth yet (just got the sources), so I don't know
> whether the duplicate code is identical or not.  What I'd like to know is
> which particular part of the checked out tree is the actively developed
> code, so I can delete the extra kruft.  Better yet, it would be nice to
> clean up the cvs repository and/or define a module so that a checkout
> results in a single, well formed source tree.  This isn't a showstopper,
> because I can figure out what I need, but this will undoubtedly confuse
> everybody that grabs a copy of the repository.
>
> Thanks,
>
> "Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for you are crunchy and good with
> ketchup"
> -- Unknown
>
>  <<Triplett, Terry.vcf>>