[MOBY-dev] data by reference - a request for comments

[Machiel Jansen]

For all I know WSRF is already been surpassed by WS-RT. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/grid/library/gr-wsrfwsrt/index.html?ca=drs-
There are quite a number of people who are disenchanted by WSRF. See http://blog.harbulot.com/post/2006/11/22/Experiences-with-WSRF for one example.

Machiel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: moby-dev-bounces at lists.open-bio.org [mailto:moby-dev-
> bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Dmitry Repchevsky
> Sent: donderdag 3 juli 2008 10:47
> To: moby-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> Subject: Re: [MOBY-dev] data by reference - a request for comments
>
> >
> > With all this talk about WSRF, SOAP, etc, what would happen with cgi
> (i.e.
> > non moby/moby-async) services?
> Interesting question... How do we implement all possible functionality
> using all possible solutions... :-)
>
> Here is my point of view:
>
> 1. "moby" service
>     It can work with "wsrf" pass by reference... it's up to the toolkit
> to look into the header
>     Attachment (SwA). Just put your attachment outside the soap message
> and find it somehow from the toolkit
>
> 2 "moby-async" service
>    The same as "moby", but also can return a reference (through wsrf)
> to
> a particular moby object
>
> 3. "doc-literal" service
>    The same as "moby", but attachment would be MTOM (backward
> compatible
> with SwA).
>
> 4. "doc-literal-async"
>    Also see no problem.
>
>
> 5. "soap", "cgi", "wsdl", "post" - what's this??? (sorry for ingnorance)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dmitry
>
> _______________________________________________
> MOBY-dev mailing list
> MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev