[MOBY-dev] [moby] Re: RFC #1914 - change & call for vote

[Pieter Neerincx]

Hi Martin,

On  21Jan2006, at 07:43, Martin Senger wrote:

> Hi,
>    Thanks for supporting the idea of having version in LSIDs.
>    I think that Mark answered all your questions. Just perhaps one  
> small
> explanation:
>
>> registered, we specify the input and output. Lets say for example I
>> register service A with as input a simple Object SomeObject_version1.
>>
>    Your assumption here is not correct: a service is not registered as
> having a simple Object SomeObject_version1, but as having a simple  
> Object
> SomeObject. We are not proposing to use version in registration -  
> we are
> registering data types by their names (not by their LSIDs).  
> Versions in
> LSIDs are good for finding that the object itself was or was not
> re-registerd (and therefore perhap changed).

Thanks for the explanation. This wasn't clear to me yet, so I made  
some wrong assumptions.
Leaving the LSIDs and therefore version numbers out for the objects  
when registering services makes life much easier :).

Bring on the version numbered LSIDs!

Pi


>    Cheers,
>    Martin
>
> -- 
> Martin Senger
>    email: martin.senger at gmail.com
>    skype: martinsenger
> consulting for:
>    International Rice Research Institute
>    Biometrics and Bioinformatics Unit
>    DAPO BOX 7777, Metro Manila
>    Philippines, phone: +63-2-580-5600 (ext.2324)
>
>

Wageningen University and Research centre (WUR)
Laboratory of Bioinformatics
Transitorium (building 312) room 1038
Dreijenlaan 3
6703 HA Wageningen
phone: 0317-484 706
fax: 0317-483 584
mobile: 06-143 66 783
pieter.neerincx at wur.nl