[Bioperl-pipeline] Re: biopipe schema GIF

[Shawn]

Wow great, and I just put up the list of CodeDocumentation todos on wiki
last nite :)

Just a note that my clear up the confusion u mentioned below,
an ER diagram can be a little (albeit quite tied to) different from the
schema. I think we wanna represent the object-relationships? Kinda like
the diagram Jerm had for GFD where u represent the data model and the 
relationships so that might clear up the ambiguity allowing the schema
to be more tied to implementation/performance, while objects more for
human conceptualization. So u don't have to get confused about messy id
tags.

IMHO

shawn

On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 17:39, Elia Stupka wrote:
> Hello guys,
> 
> Chen Peng has kindly produced a schema of the pipeline for us. A few
> striking naming problems (which cause missing lines in the schema):
> 
> 1)in iohandler we call adaptor_id, while in the dbadaptor table we call it
> dbadaptor (because we also have streamadaptor, I understand...) this makes
> the schema not easy to grasp (and to automate).... that was why initially
> I suggested one table only, with a type in that table. If you want two
> tables, then we should call them adaptor_id in both, and make the link
> that way
> 
> 2)The rule table has current and next, which should be current_analysis_id
> and next_analysis_id to make the foreign keys clear
> 
> Other than that, looking neat, and we now have an ER diagram :)
> 
> Elia
> 
> ********************************
> * http://www.fugu-sg.org/~elia *
> * tel:    +65 6874 1467        *
> * mobile: +65 9030 7613        *
> * fax:    +65 6777 1117        *
> ********************************
> 
> 
>