[MOBY-dev] non-compliant services
Edward Kawas
edward.kawas at gmail.com
Tue Feb 14 17:44:10 UTC 2006
Hi,
Can you send me the workflow and example inputs?
BTW, the xml looks fine to me.
Eddie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moby-dev-bounces at biomoby.org
> [mailto:moby-dev-bounces at biomoby.org] On Behalf Of Arnaud Kerhornou
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:28 AM
> To: Core developer announcements
> Subject: Re: [MOBY-dev] non-compliant services
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> On this note, I have a service that generates GFF objects, e.g.
> <moby:GFF namespace="" id="ENSBTAG00000014911">
> <String namespace="" id="" articleName="content">
> <![CDATA[
> ENSBTAG00000014911 MatScan I$HSF_01 490 494
> 4.99
> - . # AGAAG
> ENSBTAG00000014911 MatScan I$HSF_01 487 491
> 5.48
> - . # AGAAA
> ]]>
> </String>
> </moby:GFF>
>
> Is this object correct. If so would taverna (v1.3.1) be
> affected by the new object specifications ?
>
> I have a workflow that connects the output port of a service
> returning a collection of GFF objects, and feeds a
> parse_moby_data local processor with this list of simples and
> when i have GFF objects as above, i get a list of empty objects.
>
> Thanks
> Arnaud
>
> Martin Senger wrote:
>
> >I wonder (I forgot it) what was the decision, after the big change
> >regarding not inheriting from primitive types, what to do and when
> >with services that do not comply with the new specification. I think
> >that the discussion was about what to do with old data
> types, there was
> >even a script to rectify them semi-automatically, but I do
> not recall
> >what we said about the services.
> > An example is a service getFASTAFromUniprot - a nice,
> fast, possibly
> >reliable and important service, but it returns something like this:
> >
> ><?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><moby:MOBY
> >xmlns:moby='http://www.biomoby.org/moby'
> >xmlns='http://www.biomoby.org/moby'><moby:mobyContent
> >moby:authority='mmb.pcb.ub.es'>
> > <moby:mobyData moby:queryID='sip_1_'>
> > <moby:Simple moby:articleName=''><FASTA namespace=''
> >id='Q7T7Q6'><![CDATA[>Q7T7Q6_9REOV (Q7T7Q6) Sigma C (Fragment)
> >AGLNPSQRREVVSLILSLTSNVTISHGDLTPIYERLTNLEASTELLHRSISDISTTVSNI
> >SASLQDMTHTLDDVTANLDGLRTTVTALQDSVSILSTNVTDLTNTSSAHAATLSSLQTTV
> >DGNSTAISNLKSDVSSNGLAITDLQDRVKSLESTASHGLSFSPPLSVADGVVSLDMDPYF
> >CSQRVSLTSYPAEAQLMQFRWMARGTNGSSDTIDMTVNAHCHGRRTDYMMSSTGNLTVTS
> >NVVLLTFDLSDITHIPSDLARLVPSAGFQAASFPVDVSFTRDSATHAYQAYGVYSSSRVF
> >TITFPTGGDGTA
> >]]></FASTA></moby:Simple>
> > </moby:mobyData>
> > </moby:mobyContent></moby:MOBY>
> >
> >which is, according my limited knowledge wrong (the FASTA
> should have a
> >String with the value there).
> >
> > Are we going to remove one day such services from a registry?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> MOBY-dev mailing list
> MOBY-dev at biomoby.org
> http://biomoby.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev
More information about the MOBY-dev
mailing list