[EMBOSS] Support for multi-line annotation in ig format
Peter Rice
ricepeterm at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Sep 19 11:42:15 UTC 2012
On 19/09/2012 11:58, Peter Cock wrote:
> Does it need a new format name? EMBOSS already defines "ig" and
> "igstrict" - do the USPTO files diverge from these?
The format name is needed as an option to dbxflat -idformat so we can
select a specific parser for any additional fields.
For example, in dbxfasta -idformat has 7 names for 'fasta' format.
regards,
Peter Rice
EMBOSS Team
More information about the EMBOSS
mailing list