[EMBOSS] Sixpack/transeq frame translation
Yogi Sundaravadanam
yogi.sundaravadanam at agrf.org.au
Thu Jun 21 22:21:28 UTC 2007
>Do you mean the reverse frames are numbered differently? We followed
>the
>convention used by the Staden package.
YES!
>Would a -alternative option be useful in sixpack?
YES... is there an alternative option for sixpack, though?
Yogi
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Rice [mailto:pmr at ebi.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:21 PM
To: Yogi Sundaravadanam
Cc: emboss
Subject: Re: [EMBOSS] Sixpack/transeq frame translation
Yogi Sundaravadanam wrote:
> Sixpack/transeq translations dont match BLAST translation. This is
> giving me such grief. After some research, I found out that theres an
> alternate option in transeq that translate the nucleic sequence to a
> peptide, the BLAST way. Is it possible to do the same for Sixpack?
I am not sure what you mean by "BLAST translation".
Do you mean the reverse frames are numbered differently? We followed the
convention used by the Staden package.
Would a -alternative option be useful in sixpack?
regards,
Peter Rice
More information about the EMBOSS
mailing list