[EMBOSS] Sixpack/transeq frame translation
Peter Rice
pmr at ebi.ac.uk
Wed Jun 20 13:20:59 UTC 2007
Yogi Sundaravadanam wrote:
> Sixpack/transeq translations don’t match BLAST translation. This is
> giving me such grief. After some research, I found out that there’s an
> –alternate option in ‘transeq’ that translate the nucleic sequence to a
> peptide, the BLAST way. Is it possible to do the same for Sixpack?
I am not sure what you mean by "BLAST translation".
Do you mean the reverse frames are numbered differently? We followed the
convention used by the Staden package.
Would a -alternative option be useful in sixpack?
regards,
Peter Rice
More information about the EMBOSS
mailing list