[DAS] Adjacent feature extension
Andy Jenkinson
andy.jenkinson at ebi.ac.uk
Mon Mar 7 13:11:46 UTC 2011
On 7 Mar 2011, at 12:57, Thomas Down wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Andy Jenkinson <andy.jenkinson at ebi.ac.uk> wrote:
> We should be under no illusions though that people are going to be able to implement this easily without reading the documentation carefully, no matter which option is chosen. In particular, I can foresee servers not interpreting the "type" filter appropriately, being likely to process the adjacent query then apply the type filter, which would be wrong. I have a feeling most sources implement the type filter as a passive "post filter" rather than an active one. I can tell you right now that it is going to be really quite difficult for me to implement "adjacent" correctly for the ASTD gene/transcript/exon sources, and I suspect the same will be true for retrofitting lots of other sources.
>
> I appreciate this is tough. However, given the existence of UCSC-like "super-sources" containing basically unrelated types, with potentially quite different densities and dispositions, I find it hard to see how this is going to be useful without some kind of interaction with the types filter along the lines of what I've proposed.
Absolutely.
More information about the DAS
mailing list