[DAS] [Fwd: Re: Writeback implementation]

[Andy Jenkinson]

Gustavo Salazar wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> In the Asia's implementation the ADD command is implemented by default 
> i.e. that if the UPDATES or DELETES tags doesn't appears the writeback 
> document is understood as an addition. I am implementing this in the 
> same way.

This seems fair.

> About the use of UPDATE instead of setCurrent is a good idea easier to 
> implement in client and server, however the getHistorical command still 
> looking to me as necessary.

Provenance is an important thing so functionality of this nature is 
something I would like to see. I expect this is something that anyone 
looking to use writeback in a genome annotation context would want too, 
perhaps Suzi could comment?