jan aerts (RI)
jan.aerts at bbsrc.ac.uk
Thu Apr 12 09:49:54 UTC 2007
I completely support using a system like Trac or Rubyforge for bug
tracking, feature requests, setting of milestones etc. It wouldn't
matter that much to me _which_ of the two systems is used, as long as
they _are_ used.
Go for it, Trevor!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioruby-bounces at lists.open-bio.org
> [mailto:bioruby-bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of
> Toshiaki Katayama
> Sent: 10 April 2007 08:38
> To: BioRubyML
> Subject: Re: [BioRuby] Subversion
> On 2007/04/10, at 3:56, Trevor Wennblom wrote:
> > Just to clear up any potential confusion before it arises -
> Trac is an
> > independent system built on Python. It would likely be hosted at
> > OpenBio or on the Bioruby server.
> I have never used but happy to have Trac for BioRuby project
> as long as it is hosted at OBF (I suppose that the Trac
> server should be on the same server with the subversion repository).
> I'll point dev.bioruby.org or trac.bioruby.org to the server
> so you could setup a virtual host at open-bio.org.
> BioRuby mailing list
> BioRuby at lists.open-bio.org
More information about the BioRuby