[Biopython] Planning Biopython 1.72

[Peter Cock]

Thanks Bow - do you want to do a pull request removing the
experimental warning (and the bits in the tests to ignore it),
or should I?

Another interesting proposal is from Michiel about hiding
the alphabet in the Seq object's __repr__ output:

https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/1674

Peter

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Wibowo Arindrarto <w.arindrarto at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Peter, everyone,
>
> It's been a while that the warning exists for SearchIO. I think it can
> be lifted for the next release as I don't expect any major changes to
> the API anytime soon.
>
> The index_db() PR also seems like a good inclusion for the next release.
>
> Cheers,
> Bow
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:13 PM Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Biopythoneers,
> >
> > I am hoping we can release Biopython 1.72 in the next
> > week or two - mainly so I can include this work in the
> > Biopython Project Update talk at GCCBOSC 2018:
> >
> > https://gccbosc2018.sched.com/
> >
> > To that end, are there any outstanding issues or pending
> > pull requests which we ought to address now? e.g. these
> > seem worth including:
> >
> > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1655
> > New pairwise alignment module
> >
> > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1509
> > Add translate method to Bio.SeqFeature
> >
> > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/1619
> > Preserve on-disk order in SeqIO & SearchIO indexes
> > (Does anyone want to try benchmarking the changes?)
> >
> > Bow - can we remove the experimental warning from
> > Bio.SearchIO now?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Peter
> > _______________________________________________
> > Biopython mailing list  -  Biopython at mailman.open-bio.org
> > http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/attachments/20180605/b6d5b7c4/attachment.html>