[Biopython-dev] RE: [Biojava-l] Re: [BioXML-dev] Uniform parsing vocabulary
Solbrig, Harold R.
Solbrig.Harold at mayo.edu
Mon May 21 19:10:47 EDT 2001
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bradley Marshall [mailto:bradmars at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:32 PM
> To: Matthew Pocock; Cox, Greg
> Cc: 'biojava-l at biojava.org'; 'bioperl-l at bioperl.org';
> 'bioxml-dev at bioxml.org'; 'biopython-dev at biopython.org'
> Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] Re: [BioXML-dev] Uniform parsing vocabulary
> Actually, I just looked around for this type of
> ontology last week and found nothing. I think it
> would be a valuable tool.
> --- Matthew Pocock <mrp at sanger.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Propose away - do we have ontologies for these
> > things knocking about yet?
> > Cox, Greg wrote:
> > > I apologize for the cross-posting.
> > >
> > > I'm involved in the BioJava project, and I'm
> > looking at constructing a
> > > uniform vocabulary for the parsed keys. For
> > example, currently in BioJava,
> > > if an EMBL record is parsed the Organism
> > information goes under the key
> > > 'OS', while if a Genbank record is parsed, the
> > information is under the key
> > > "ORGANISM". Are there existing standards that
> > define the keys used, or
> > > should I put together a new proposal?
> > >
> > > Greg Cox
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > BioXML-dev mailing list - BioXML-dev at bioxml.org
> > > http://bioxml.org/mailman/listinfo/bioxml-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Biojava-l mailing list - Biojava-l at biojava.org
> > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> Biojava-l mailing list - Biojava-l at biojava.org
More information about the Biopython-dev