[Bioperl-l] Problem to install bioperl-1.6.1
Scott Cain
scott at scottcain.net
Mon Mar 17 17:31:33 UTC 2014
Hi Michael,
A rather odd convention in the Perl community (perhaps elsewhere? I don't
know) is that a version number of 1.006001 is the same as 1.6.1. I imagine
the advantage of the first way of expressing it is that it is a real
number, so you can use math functions (like < and >) when comparing version
numbers.
Also, I should point out that 1.6.1 is pretty old. The current version is
1.6.923.
Scott
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Michael Angel Perez Cabarcas <
mperez at uniandes.edu.co> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to install bioperl-1.6.1 according the steps described in
> http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Installing_BioPerl_on_Unix section
> (Installing using CPAN). At the end I got the this output:
>
> Writing /usr/local/lib64/perl5/auto/Bio/.packlist
> Will try to install symlinks to /usr/local/bin
> CJFIELDS/BioPerl-1.6.1.tar.gz
> ./Build install -- OK
>
> In order to verify what version is installed, I executed this command:
>
> perl -MBio::Root::Version -e 'print $Bio::Root::Version::VERSION,"\n"'
>
> The output is: 1.006001
>
> I do not understand why the version is 1.006001 even if the installed
> version is 1.6.1.
>
> I am working on CentOS 6, 64bits
>
> Could you please help me to solve this issue?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Michael Pérez
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Cain, Ph. D. scott at scottcain dot
net
GMOD Coordinator (http://gmod.org/) 216-392-3087
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list