[Bioperl-l] Some trouble getting started
Chris Maloney
voldrani at gmail.com
Tue Apr 16 13:49:32 UTC 2013
> Are you volunteering for some SysAdmin type stuff then?
Yes -- I was starting to get the impression there was no one minding
the store. In which case, I could take a stab at fixing these issues,
if someone were willing to give me the keys. But otherwise ... it
doesn't matter, as long as someone takes a look. I could probably fix
the mediawiki and wordpress issues, though, if no one else has time.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Fields, Christopher J
<cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2013, Peter Cock wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2013, Chris Maloney wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> * The wiki doesn't allow new users to log in:
>>>> https://redmine.open-bio.org/issues/3424: neither the OBF wiki nor
>>>> the bioperl wiki. Presumably this has something to do with the
>>>> migration to AWS
>>>> (http://news.open-bio.org/news/2012/11/server-transition-to-aws/) in
>>>> November last year. If so, that's five months -- a long time! That
>>>> ticket itself has been open for more than a month.
>>>> I would like to fix it, but I don't know whom to contact, and ...
>>>
>>>
>>> I wasn't aware of this until very recently, it was reported on the
>>> Biopython list and forwarded to the root-l SysAdmin team.
>>> http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/2013-April/008510.html
>>>
>>>
>> That bug is a bit odd - it doesn't seem to have been filed against
>> any particular project, and has no assignee - and so most likely
>> no one was ever emailed of the bug's existence. :(
>>
>> Peter
>
> It's an OBF bug; makes sense in light of the common wiki issues across Bio* wikis at the moment. Looks as if we never decided where such issues end up going or who they would be assigned to.
>
> What is the consensus on using redmine at the moment? Are the various Bio* (except BioPerl) still using it? Using Github? I haven't gone there primarily b/c they don't allow attachments (though that isn't necessarily a bad thing in some cases…). Reason I ask: I would suggest we set up this project tracker so that it's primarily around web-admin, etc. for OBF, point the email forwards to somewhere useful, populate it with devs from the various groups, etc. But, if no one but bioperl is using redmine then I don't see the point.
>
> chris
>
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list