[Bioperl-l] ps-another attempt at installing Ace for BioPerl
Chris Fields
cjfields at illinois.edu
Thu May 5 18:31:54 UTC 2011
Or even 'install Bio::Perl' should work, if the CPAN index is up-to-date (it should install the latest).
chris
On May 5, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Kevin Brown wrote:
> I notice that CPAN is returning quite a few different bundles.
>
> Try "install CJFIELDS/BioPerl-1.6.900.tar.gz" and see what that gives
> you.
>
> Kevin Brown
> Center for Innovations in Medicine
> Biodesign Institute
> Arizona State University
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bioperl-l-bounces at lists.open-bio.org [mailto:bioperl-l-
>> bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Powell Phd, Amy Jo
>> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 10:38 AM
>> To: Chris Fields
>> Cc: Lincoln Stein; BioPerl List; Supinger,Adam W
>> Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] ps-another attempt at installing Ace for
>> BioPerl
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I've (repeatedly) tried to install (all relevant possible versions)
>> using
>> by sudo'ing a cpan window. Here is the version of perl on my machine:
>>
>> s930712:go_daily-termdb-tables ajpowel$ perl -v
>>
>> This is perl, v5.10.0 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
>> (with 2 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
>>
>>
>> Here are the errors that are typically generated (in my attempts to
>> install):
>>
>>
>> cpan[7]> i /BioPerl/
>>
>> Bundle Bundle::BioPerl (CRAFFI/Bundle-BioPerl-2.1.8.tar.gz)
>> Distribution BOZO/Fry-Lib-BioPerl-0.15.tar.gz
>> Distribution CJFIELDS/BioPerl-1.6.1.tar.gz
>> Distribution CJFIELDS/BioPerl-1.6.900.tar.gz
>> Distribution CJFIELDS/BioPerl-Run-1.006900.tar.gz
>> Distribution CRAFFI/Bundle-BioPerl-2.1.8.tar.gz
>> Module < Bio::LiveSeq::IO::BioPerl (CJFIELDS/BioPerl-1.6.1.tar.gz)
>> Module < Fry::Lib::BioPerl (BOZO/Fry-Lib-BioPerl-0.15.tar.gz)
>> Author BIOPERLML ("Bioperl-l" <bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>)
>> 9 items found
>>
>> install Bundle::BioPerl
>>
>>
>> Test Summary Report
>> -------------------
>> t/testindexer.t (Wstat: 768 Tests: 5 Failed: 3)
>> Failed tests: 2-3, 5
>> Non-zero exit status: 3
>> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 11 tests but ran 5.
>> Files=2, Tests=15, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.06 cusr
>> 0.01 csys = 0.10 CPU)
>> Result: FAIL
>> Failed 1/2 test programs. 3/15 subtests failed.
>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>> MINGYILIU/Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.10-withoutworldwriteables.tar.gz
>> one dependency not OK (Bio::Index::AbstractSeq); additionally test
>> harness
>> failed
>> /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
>> //hint// to see the cpan-testers results for installing this module,
>> try:
>> reports MINGYILIU/Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.10-
>> withoutworldwriteables.tar.gz
>> Running make install
>> make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
>> Failed during this command:
>> LDS/AcePerl-1.92.tar.gz : make_test NO
>> TWH/GD-SVG-0.33.tar.gz : make_test NO one
>> dependency not OK (GD); additionally test harness failed
>> MINGYILIU/Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.10-withoutworldwriteables.tar.gz:
>> make_test NO one dependency not OK (Bio::Index::AbstractSeq);
>> additionally
>> test harness failed
>> CJFIELDS/BioPerl-1.6.1.tar.gz : make_test NO 2
>> dependencies missing (Ace,GraphViz)
>>
>>
>>
>> Bottom line, the whole installation appears to fail (no matter what
>> package try to install) b/c of dependency issues (I.e., GraphViz &
>> Ace).
>> My colleague has run into the same problems.
>>
>> Sorry, I maybe used the wrong jargon when I said 'distribution.' I
>> always
>> use CPAN when installing perl modules. Make sense? Any
> guidance/help
>> you could offer would be greatly appreciated. Regards, AJP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/5/11 10:45 AM, "Chris Fields" <cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Amy,
>>>
>>> Are you installing this using the system perl (which I think is perl
>>> 5.10.1)? I'm running BioPerl on the same OS w/o problems, but I am
>> also
>>> using a bit more of a custom setup (perlbrew in particular, which
>> allows
>>> me to switch perl versions, and cpanminus). In general I have found
>> the
>>> UNIX install instructions to work fine.
>>>
>>> Having a more detailed list of problems you have encountered would
>> help
>>> tremendously as well. Specifically, how exactly are you installing
>>> BioPerl? What tests are failing?
>>>
>>> Also, by distributions, do you mean something like fink or macports?
>> I
>>> think a bioperl version exists on macports, but I'm not sure how
>>> up-to-date it is.
>>>
>>> chris
>>>
>>> On May 5, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Powell Phd, Amy Jo wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chris & Lincoln,
>>>>
>>>> A fully installable & useable package/bundle/distribution of
> BioPerl
>>>> for the (large) community of Mac users would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> My colleagues and I, all Mac users, have not been able to load
>> BioPerl
>>>> successfully onto our machines.
>>>>
>>>> Here are the specs for my particular machine: MacBook Pro running
>>>> SnowLeopardOSX (Mac OS X 10.6.7 (10J869)).
>>>>
>>>> Detailed instructions on how to install a new version would also be
>>>> greatly appreciated. Thanks very much. Regards, AJP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Lincoln Stein <lincoln.stein at gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 09:46:08 -0400
>>>> To: Christopher Fields <cjfields1 at gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Amy Jo Powell <ajpowel at sandia.gov>, BioPerl List
>>>> <bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>, "Supinger, Adam W"
>> <awsupin at sandia.gov>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] ps-another attempt at installing Ace for
>>>> BioPerl
>>>>
>>>>> I think we should remove Ace from bioperl; there can't be that
> many
>>>>> people still using it, and I'm not devoting any cycles to
>> maintaining
>>>>> the package. I'm happy to do the dirty deed unless there's a strong
>>>>> objection.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lincoln
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Christopher Fields
>>>>> <cjfields1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> (cc'ing the main bioperl list)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amy,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For future correspondence you should contact the bioperl mailing
>>>>>> list. You can subscribe to it here if needed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As for the modules in question (AcePerl and GraphViz), these
>> aren't
>>>>>> absolutely required for most BioPerl functionality; tests that
>>>>>> required them are designed to skip if the modules aren't present.
>>>>>> Have you tried *not* installing those and running tests?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Powell Phd, Amy Jo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FY: I made another attempt at installing an Ace package that
>>>>>> BioPerl can (hopefully) use, to no avail:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LDS/AcePerl-1.92.tar.gz
>>>>>>> /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
>>>>>>> //hint// to see the cpan-testers results for installing this
>>>>>> module, try:
>>>>>>> reports LDS/AcePerl-1.92.tar.gz
>>>>>>> Running make install
>>>>>>> make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
>>>>>>> Failed during this command:
>>>>>>> LDS/AcePerl-1.92.tar.gz : make_test NO
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>>>>>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>>>>>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Lincoln D. Stein
>>>>> Director, Informatics and Biocomputing Platform
>>>>> Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
>>>>> 101 College St., Suite 800
>>>>> Toronto, ON, Canada M5G0A3
>>>>> 416 673-8514
>>>>> Assistant: Renata Musa <Renata.Musa at oicr.on.ca>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list