[Bioperl-l] branch pruning v.2

Chris Fields cjfields at illinois.edu
Sat May 15 03:45:07 UTC 2010


This was moved into bioperl-dev at some point:  

http://github.com/bioperl/bioperl-dev/tree/master/Bio/SeqFeature/

Might be obsolete as well.

chris

On May 14, 2010, at 6:54 PM, Jason Stajich wrote:

> lightweight_feature_branch was my test built with a feature type that is based on arrays instead of hashes got 25+% speedup I believe - have to go back to the archives to see what I claimed was speedup... =)
> 
> I think that Bio::SeqFeature::Slim might be at least one speedup by Lincoln for Gbrowse that addresses some of the speed problem, though I think it still isn't array-based for data storage.
> 
> -j
> 
> Robert Buels wrote, On 5/14/10 4:01 PM:
>> Chris Fields wrote:
>>> On a related note, going through, it appears the git conversion didn't track merges back to trunk.  For instance, I know the featann_rollback was merged to trunk but it's not showing up.  I know svn had poor merge-tracking prior to 1.5 (where svn:mergeinfo came into play), so it may be hard to actually find true merges w/o that. 
>> 
>> OK, here are all our current branches, I will go through them in order of last-modified date.
>> 
>> 1998-12-11  bioperl
>> 1999-02-19  release-0-04-bug
>> 1999-04-13  bioperl-live
>> 1999-04-13  stable-0-05
>> 2000-01-27  branch-ensembl-m1
>> 2000-02-07  internal-branch-pre-delete-06-tag
>> 2000-03-22  stable-0-05-new
>> 2001-02-19  branch-06
>> 2001-11-14  branch-07-ensembl-120
>> 2001-12-28  steve_chervitz
>> 2002-01-16  branch-07
>> 2002-10-22  branch-1-0-0
>> 2003-07-07  branch-1-2-collection
>> 2003-10-13  branch-1-2
>> 2004-10-20  ontology-cache
>> 2005-04-14  branch-1-4
>> 2006-01-11  bioperl-branch-1-5-1
>> 2006-08-14  branch-experimental
>> 2007-02-14  branch-1-5-2
>> 2007-08-28  featann_rollback
>> 2007-11-07  lightweight_feature_branch
>> 
>> Proposal: move the above to refs/archive and not worry any further about them.  Maybe we can throw them out in 2020.
>> 
>> 2009-06-17  restriction-refactor
>> 
>> Proposal: delete, looks like it was merged in a2cb40e6c9c7da4f776dbb72a0266f54320fa37f
>> 
>> 2009-07-16  topic/bug_2515
>>  proposal: keep, jhannah "working"  ;-)
>> 
>> 2009-08-13  TRY_gff_refactor
>>  proposal: delete, git claims it is merged
>> 
>> 2009-08-13  TRY_locatableseq_refactor
>>  proposal: delete, git claims it is merged
>> 
>> 2009-09-29  branch-1-6
>>  keep, 1.6 maint branch i think.
>> 
>> 2009-10-14  anydbm-branch
>>  keep, MAJ working.  MAJ, maybe you should move this to topic/ ?
>> 
>> 2010-01-31  TRY_featureio_refactor
>>  keep, but looks dead.  cjfields, maybe you want to delete it?
>> 
>> 2010-05-12  topic/bug_3077
>>  delete, git claims it is merged.
>> 
>> Please review, and I'll do the work if people agree.
>> 
>> Rob
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l





More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list