[Bioperl-l] Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase: Capture the command that is executed?

[Chris Fields]

I don't necessarily have a problem with it, as long as Mark's okay with it and it doesn't introduce additional dependencies to core.  

chris

On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:22 PM, Dan Kortschak wrote:

> I'll do that for WrapperBase::CommandExts this afternoon, but I'd like
> to get comment from Jason or Chris before I go changing WrapperBase
> itself.
> 
> cheers
> Dan
> 
> On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 20:11 -0400, Mark A. Jensen wrote:
>> By all means patch it in, I say--
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Dan Kortschak" <dan.kortschak at adelaide.edu.au>
>> To: <bimber at wisc.edu>
>> Cc: <bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 5:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase: Capture the command that 
>> is executed?
>> 
>> 
>>> Hi Ben,
>>> 
>>> Yeah, that's a good point. An attribute and accessor pair would do the
>>> job: keep the last command string sent to IPC::Run and allow the user to
>>> see this if they want.
>>> 
>>> Is there any reason this would be objected to as an addition to the
>>> CommandExts and WrapperBase APIs?
>>> 
>>> Dan
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l