[Bioperl-l] [moby] Re: bioperl-pipeline?
Chris Fields
cjfields at illinois.edu
Wed Jan 28 21:42:09 UTC 2009
I see there is a Moby code release from Feb. 2008, so I'm assuming
it's very much 'alive' and happy (and still active).
http://biomoby.org/PerlReleases/
chris
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
> Biomoby is.... errr.... happy :-)
>
> ? status in what respect ?
>
> M
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:23:00 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu
> > wrote:
>
>> Mark,
>>
>> I think the general idea was to know what the status of biomoby and
>> bioperl-pipeline was (not the two together).
>>
>> chris
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm... I can't tell what you want me to do here... Are there
>>> biomoby components in bioperl-pipeline? If so,can you tell me
>>> which services you need me to look at?
>>>
>>> M
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:33:11 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> biopipe.org is dead. I don't know whether that extends then to
>>>>> bioperl-pipeline, but quite possibly so.
>>>>
>>>> My guess is yes, it is dead.
>>>>
>>>>> Biomoby is alive (if possibly in hibernation) AFAIAA. Maybe if
>>>>> we all collectively yell "Mark" he'll wake up and say something.
>>>>>
>>>>> -hilmar
>>>>
>>>> MAARRRRRKKK!
>>>>
>>>> chris
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list