hlapp at gmx.net
Wed Jan 28 18:17:35 UTC 2009
biopipe.org is dead. I don't know whether that extends then to bioperl-
pipeline, but quite possibly so.
Biomoby is alive (if possibly in hibernation) AFAIAA. Maybe if we all
collectively yell "Mark" he'll wake up and say something.
On Jan 28, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Chris Fields wrote:
> I know many have moved to Taverna, yes. There were some notes on
> the wiki about possibly getting bioperl-pipeline working with
> Taverna but (as you have noted) no one has progressed along those
> On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:39 AM, Giovanni Marco Dall'Olio wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Heikki Lehvaslaiho
>> <heikki.lehvaslaiho at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Could someone give an update on the current status of
>>> bioperl-pipeline/biopipe project?
>> There are many other tools you can use to create pipelines.
>> For example, make and any derived tool
>> - http://swc.scipy.org/lec/build.html
>> - http://www.nodalpoint.org/2007/03/18/a_pipeline_is_a_makefile
>> or, I have been told well of kepler:
>> - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_scientific_workflow_system
>> Hope it can help you.
>>> It seems to have been quiet for a long time. Incidentally, same
>>> to apply on BioMoby project.
>>> It is sort of shame, because a lot of good can be said of the aims
>>> both projects.
>>> Is there something generic that I just have not heard off or is it
>>> Taverna/Grid that has taken over.
>>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> My blog on bioinformatics (now in English): http://bioinfoblog.it
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l