[Bioperl-l] [ANNOUNCEMENT] BioPerl 1.6.0

[Mark A. Jensen]

I also received this warning on a test of the trunk under Cygwin/Perl 5.10.0-
(not to say that my local env is not funky....)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Messina" <David.Messina at sbc.su.se>
To: "Chris Fields" <cjfields at illinois.edu>
Cc: <bioperl-announce-l at lists.open-bio.org>; "BioPerl List" 
<bioperl-l at bioperl.org>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] [ANNOUNCEMENT] BioPerl 1.6.0


> Thanks so much, Chris and everyone else, for your hard work on this release.
>
> All tests pass on CentOS 5.2, perl 5.8.8, but I am still seeing that weire
> Bio::DBRegistry warning:
>
> t/LocalDB/Registry.............................3/14
> --------------------- WARNING ---------------------
> MSG: Couldn't call new_from_registry() on [Bio::DB::Flat]
>
> ------------- EXCEPTION: Bio::Root::Exception -------------
> MSG: you must specify an indexing scheme
> STACK: Error::throw
> STACK: Bio::Root::Root::throw Bio/Root/Root.pm:357
> STACK: Bio::DB::Flat::new Bio/DB/Flat.pm:160
> STACK: Bio::DB::Flat::new_from_registry Bio/DB/Flat.pm:252
> STACK: Bio::DB::Registry::_load_registry Bio/DB/Registry.pm:164
> STACK: Bio::DB::Registry::new Bio/DB/Registry.pm:95
> STACK: t/LocalDB/Registry.t:51
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> t/LocalDB/Registry.............................ok
>
>
>
> This may simply be something funky in my local environment since no one else
> has corroborated, though.
>
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
>